Name that refactoring: 2 - Version 2 44
A few updates applied to the second name that refactoring. Note that I’m using a star to represent a problem dependency. It is the “star” of the refactoring. I’m looking for a better image. I could go with a database icon, but the principle is more general than that. The cloud was confusing. So if you have an idea, please let me know what it is!
Again, thanks for taking a look and giving me the feedback.
Step 0: Problematic Dependency
Step 1: Capture dependency in a single class
Step 2: Raise the abstraction to a domain-level interface
Step 3: Introduce test doubles as needed
Name that refactoring: 1 - Version 2 44
Here is an update to the first name that refactoring based on feedback. How about this?
Step 0: Method with embedded dependency
Step 1:Extract method to move dependency to another method
Step 2: Subclass and override method with new code that does not have original dependency
So what do you think? Better or worse?
What about using the star in other image? In general, the star could represent the dependency we’re trying to get rid of.
Name that refactoring: 2 75
Ok, so I’m getting good feedback on the first picture. Now for a series of pictures.
How do you interpret this series?
Step 0
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Name that refactoring: 1 67
I’m working on writing up a few handouts I can use in a TDD class (and a few other places). There are a few drawings I keep doing and I’m trying to replicate them so I can refer to something.
Problem is, with many such drawings, the observation of the creation is as important as the end product. I’d like your feedback/recommendations (or links to better pictures). I’m curious about at least two things.- What does this picture suggest to you or what can you draw from it, if anything?
- Do you think this would be better served as a series of pictures showing the build-up?
Thanks for your feedback.